Gut punch!
|
Posted:Mar 18, 2015 2:06 pm
Last Updated:Oct 14, 2016 4:57 pm
7912 Views
|
What's worse, getting rejected outright, or starting to make a connection with someone and then getting rejected?
it's got to be the latter.
I found someone that was looking for chemistry and a connection--like I was. She was cute, she was smart, and we hit it off. The conversation was fun (and dirty!) and things were progressing really well. We made plans to meet (and have crazy bunny sex if things clicked) and then comes the text...
"I need a different kind of pampering than u can give me. I'm going to have to cancel our plans. I'm sorry.  "
Wait... what? Came out of left field on me. I was expecting it to be about our plans for tonight. (Well, I guess it was, in a way...) We talked a little more, but she had already decided this site wasn't what she needed and deleted her account. Despite everything that we had been talking about, those same things were now not what she wanted. We wished each other luck in finding what we were looking for, and that was that.
Maybe she just got cold feet. Maybe she had a revelation. Who can say? Thing is--it's pretty easy to tell when the "not interested" message is coming. The time between communication increases. Answers get shorter and shorter. If I'm getting one-word answers from a woman I'm talking to, it's "Thanks for your time, it was great to meet you!" Women--if you're not interested, just say so. It's okay. We know you're nice, and don't want to hurt anyone's feelings, but stringing things out until he gets the hint or gets bored and just leaves is lame.
Anyway, this one caught me off-guard, because things were trending in the opposite direction. Last thing we had talked about was how excited we were for today, who deserved to be pampered more, who was more fun, etc. What changed her mind between then and the next message I got? Who knows?
C'est la vie.
The search for a connection with chemistry continues...
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
"Highly Intelligent"
|
Posted:Mar 29, 2014 3:06 pm
Last Updated:Jun 16, 2015 8:53 am
9675 Views
|
I read profiles.
It's crazy, I know--especially on this site. And it's true that usually I, like most males, will click a profile based on the picture displayed. But, really, that's no different from smiling at a pretty woman, right? You see someone you're attracted to, and your first interest is based on what you see. Then you go over and find out if the attraction is mutual, and if there's anything deeper than your initial impression. No different online, right?
Sadly, that means I view a lot of profiles and send messages to almost no one. There are a few key things I'm looking for and they're hard to find. Lots of beautiful women on this site, but I'm looking for more than just beauty.
I might key in on some things, but I also find some things to be instant turnoffs. And, look, I know writing a profile is hard. It's tough to distill yourself down to some words. But some phrasing just rubs me the wrong way. I like to call it self-evaluating phrasing.
You know... stuff like "highly intelligent." We're not the best evaluators of whether or not we're smart or funny or what have you. In fact, I usually feel that if you have to mention your intelligence in a profile, that's an indicator you're probably not as smart as you think you are. After all, a truly intelligent person wouldn't have to brag about it, right? You'd be able to tell they were intelligent from their writing. Or they might say they were looking for someone intelligent. Plenty of other ways of communicating it than simply stating it.
It's an adventure out there for sure, but certain traits are just better shown than stated. If you have to tell everyone you're funny... well, that says it all, right? Funny people don't say, "I'm funny!" They just are.
Nothing like telling me what I should think of you rather than letting me discover it for myself to make me click on to the next profile? What kinds of things should people not have to state if they were really true?
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
Unusual Triggers
|
Posted:Nov 28, 2013 12:36 pm
Last Updated:Nov 4, 2016 5:35 pm
10477 Views
|
So, some things are universal turn-ons. Everybody likes good abs, a great smile, shining eyes, a nice butt... etc. But are there more unique things that still get you going?
For me, there are two: A nice chin and the back of the thigh. I don't know what it is about either one, but they both give me that involuntary clench in the stomach.
A nice chin is hard to describe. It doesn't need to be huge, just well-defined. Especially the jawline at the back by the neck. I wish I could explain why I find it so sexy, but I can't. I just know that jawlines do it for me.
The back of the thigh is similar. Look at the backs of the thighs on the woman in this picture. She's clearly in shape, and it creates a subtle, supple line on the back of her thighs. Now, I love curves on a woman, and that curve--understated and soft--is my absolute favorite one. I swear looking at the curve in that picture makes me so crazy with lust, I feel I could get her pregnant just by staring at it as long as I do!
What about you? Anything on someone's body that tickles your fancy that others might say, "Really?" at?
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
Surprise!
|
Posted:Nov 27, 2013 7:18 am
Last Updated:Nov 4, 2016 5:36 pm
10242 Views
|
You ever have one of those days where you're not expecting anything, and then bam, you're up until 2am talking with someone? Sometimes I think the universe likes to taunt us by leaving things where we never expect to find them.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Bush
|
Posted:Nov 26, 2013 8:31 pm
Last Updated:Nov 4, 2016 5:36 pm
10259 Views
|
I know I'm in the minority on this one, but I love a good, thick bush on a woman. One of my favorite sights is seeing a woman spread her legs with her hair all soaked and matted with our cum. Wetness in general is a powerful turn-on for me, so a soaked bush is just part of that. There's not many things more satisfying than visual signs of arousal.
I never understand the complaints about hair. My feeling is that when you get up close to it, the human body is pretty gross--so I don't know why you'd draw the line at something like hair. I love going down on a woman far more than is healthy, but I also took biology classes, and know that much of a woman's wetness is mucous being squeezed out as blood floods the region. It's snot. And I'd drink every drop of it if I had my way. It sounds gross when you describe it that way, but it's not gross in practice. And if I'm not grossed out by putting my tongue in every hole a woman has, I'm definitely not going to be grossed out by a little hair.
That doesn't mean a bush is a requirement for me, however. I mean... far be it for me to tell someone else how to groom their body. Once you get to the hips, there are no parts of a woman's body that aren't sexy, so shaved, trimmed, whatever--it's all hot to me.
Still, if I had my choice, I'd always choose bush.
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Bareback
|
Posted:Nov 5, 2013 9:36 am
Last Updated:Nov 4, 2016 5:36 pm
10501 Views
|
I think I'm like the rest of the human race in that I prefer my sex bareback. There is nothing more satisfying than the feeling of skin on skin, and for me, the second-most enjoyable part of sex is the feeling of cumming inside--deep inside--a woman. It definitely gives me a sense of emotional connection.
But, uh, I don't do it with just anyone. I've used condoms with just about all of my partners, because I like bareback sex, but I like my health more. I would love to find someone I can trust to both get on the pill (or something else) and not see other people so that we could simply enjoy each other's bodies, but I'm certainly not going to trust a stranger with that.
I haven't had a lot of contact with women on HornyWife here, but most haven't even brought up the possibility of protection. That's usually a red flag for me. Women, is this common? Do you usually assume condoms will be used?
I've also seen it mentioned on some women's profiles that it's a turnoff to see pictures of unprotected sex with others. I have to agree. It's definitely hot for the fantasy--I want to cum in every beautiful woman I see--but the reality is much less pleasing to think about. It's tough to know from a picture if you've vetted your partner and know they're D/D free. Maybe it's fair to assume so, but it's safer to assume not.
I'm pretty sure I know where most women stand on this, but what about guys? Have you gone bareback with a stranger? Would you? I probably would if I could verify the STD test and birth control myself, but most people don't have that kind of proof just lying around. So for me, it's guilty until proven innocent, and condoms are a must unless real trust is involved.
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
To link to this blog (IPreferPassion) use [blog IPreferPassion] in your messages.
|
|
|
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
1
|
21
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
